Unwanted pregnancy is a difficult and emotional time for a woman. If you have been raised in a culture that demonizes women for having sex or having an abortion it is doubly difficult. I am not surprised at all that a woman could be guilted into keeping the pregnancy. But I also don't doubt that she will feel conflicted and even regret her choice when the things she wanted to avoid actually happen, i.e. lose her job, not having a place to live, giving up school, raising a baby alone, etc. These same people who guilt a woman into having a child are the same ones that want to take away food stamps, WIC, health care, and everything else that allows a woman to raise a baby. Their ultimate goal is to not only make women give birth but to also live in abject poverty afterwards in hope that their example will deter other young women from having premarital sex. I don't think they give a rat's ass about the child. Children are fodder for the cult. Poverty and suffering help their cause because those who are down and out are easier to convert,
That is my whole point with this pro-life foetus killing is murder philosophy. No one, none of these anti-choice people would be willing to provide good, solid practical help if a pregnant unmarried woman came to them for assistance. In fact, the pro-lifers are usually those who call loudest for cuts to social programmes to help such people. IF these women whose 'babies were saved by the 180 film' are real people, they will be taken in by Livings Waters, filmed, told to endorse the film as a babysaver in exchange for a hot meal and maybe a packet of nappies for the baby and then catapulted out to shift for themselves.
If anyone at Living Waters 180 is reading this, help these young women keep their babies. Find them a job or help them get social security. Don't just film them playing with their healthy offspring and saying how grateful they are to 180 and then push them out into the world. Show a young, undecided woman who is pregnant exactly what will happen if they choose to bring their foetus to term, eh?
IS GOD WILLING TO PREVENT EVIL,BUT NOT ABLE? THEN HE IS NOT OMNIPOTENT.IS HE ABLE BUT NOT WILLING?THEN HE IS MALEVOLENT.IS HE BOTH ABLE AND WILLING? THEN WENCE COMETH EVIL? IS HE NEITHER ABLE NOR WILLING?THEN WHY CALL HIM GOD. (EPICURIUS : CIRCA 300 BC)